The New Standard for Search Privacy

There are really only two legal/ethical issues that are regularly lodged against search engines: copyrights and privacy. The copyright debate has taken its way to courts across the world and has resulted in several technologies which empower webmasters to protect their copyrighted information. No fewer than 4 separate standards: robots.txt, nocache, noindex, and nofollow, allow webmasters to opt-out of indexing, caching, and other search engine activites which may violate or endanger their copyright.

How many standards exist to protect privacy? Until today, none.

I am proud to introduce #privacy (http://www.poundprivacy.org), the new search standard for privacy. The concept is fairly simple: searchers should be able to opt out of tracking mechanisms when they append the term #privacy at the end of a query.

The simple truth is this: companies like Google cannot reconcile their “do no evil” mottos with their current positions on privacy. If you believe that a standard for search privacy should be created, please visit http://www.poundprivacy.org to read up on how you can help.

It is time that the search engines stop relying on legal teams and privacy policy loopholes to defend themselves, and start empowering their users to protect their own privacy.

*Note: Delivos at http://www.seohelp.org pointed out that censorship is also an important issue to be noted.

No tags for this post.

4 Comments

  1. CPCcurmudgeon
    Oct 17, 2006

    Do you think the engines will adopt this standard? I doubt it,
    considering that they have to store and analyze this information for
    quite some time after it is logged. Because of things like click
    fraud, the clickstreams need to be studied for evidence of
    wrongdoing.

    Note: There is nothing wrong with storing IPs independent of search queries. The privacy violation of knowing someone used Google is far less than knowing how, why, and for what end result they did. So, for example, if the same IP clicks the same ad over and over again, that the query is not associated with the IP is of no consequence.

  2. Yes I feel that a user should have an option rather freedom to keep his personal and sensitive data PRIVATE wile using search engines.

  3. Tyler Banfield
    Oct 24, 2006

    I looks like it’s about time for a new post!

  4. yza
    Sep 3, 2007

    Another privacy 🙂

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *